Texas judge approves historic settlement agreement in Formosa Plastics case


U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt on Tuesday approved a $50 million settlement agreement between a scrappy environmental coalition and plastics giant Formosa. The settlement is the largest in U.S. history resulting from a citizen environmental suit.

Diane Wilson organizes bags of plastic pellet samples she’s collected over the past three years near the Formosa plant. Emree Weaver / The Texas Tribune

Texas judge approves historic settlement agreement in Formosa Plastics case” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

A federal judge on Tuesday approved a historic settlement agreement between Taiwanese-based plastics manufacturer Formosa and a scrappy environmental activist represented by indigent legal services nonprofit Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid.

TRLA said the $50 million settlement is the largest in U.S. history involving a private citizen’s lawsuit against an industrial polluter under federal clean air and water laws. The money will be poured into a trust over the next five years and used to pay for programs supporting pollution mitigation, habitat restoration, public education and other environmental efforts on the middle Texas Gulf Coast.

Diane Wilson, a retired shrimper and an environmental activist, sued Formosa in July 2017, alleging that its Port Comfort plant had illegally discharged thousands of plastic pellets and other pollutants into Lavaca Bay and other nearby waterways. Wilson was joined in the suit by environmental group San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper, which has been represented by two private attorneys.

In its defense, Formosa argued that a $121,875 fine against it by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the state’s environmental regulatory agency, made the lawsuit moot.

But U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt strongly disagreed in a June ruling, calling the company a “serial offender” and saying “the TCEQ’s findings and assessment merely shows the difficulty or inability of the TCEQ to bring Formosa into compliance with its permit restrictions.”

Hoyt approved the $50 million settlement, which the parties announced in October, on Tuesday during a hearing in Victoria.

“Having the $50 million settlement go to local environmental projects feels like justice,” Wilson said in a statement. “Formosa polluted Lavaca Bay and nearby waterways for years. Now it will pay for strong community projects that will improve the health and welfare of our waterways and beaches.”

In a statement, TLRA noted that the settlement is not only the largest citizen suit settlement in U.S. history, but the largest by far — five times larger than the next highest clean water settlement and tens of millions of dollars more than the next highest clean air settlement, which was won by Texas environmental groups in a case against ExxonMobil.

During the weeklong trial in the Formosa case, which began in late March, Wilson and Waterkeeper members dragged in boxes full of thousands of milky white plastic pellets they had painstakingly collected from Lavaca and Matagorda bays and Cox Creek with the help of volunteers.

Formosa attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

In a statement issued in October when the settlement was announced, the executive vice president for the U.S. branch of Formosa said the conditions laid out in the agreement “demonstrate Formosa’s commitment to manufacturing our products in a safe and environmentally friendly manner.

“We will continue to partner with local communities and stakeholders to ensure that (Formosa Plastics Corporation) USA environmental programs are at the top of our industry,” Ken Mounger said.

Under the settlement, Formosa agreed to comply with “zero discharge” of all plastics in the future and to clean up existing pollution. Hoyt inquired about that progress during the hearing on Tuesday, saying he wanted to make sure it became a reality.

If Formosa is found to be in violation again, additional fines for each documented discharge will be paid into the settlement fund. The first penalty would cost the company $10,000 per discharge this year, with yearly increments climbing to more than $54,000 per discharge.

Related News

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2019/12/03/texas-judge-approves-settlement-agreement-water-pollution-formosa/.

The Texas Tribune is proud to celebrate 10 years of exceptional journalism for an exceptional state. Explore the next 10 years with us.

More from MyHighPlains.com:

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video Forecast

More Forecast

Don't Miss