81°F
Sponsored by

The Contraception Conundrum

Supreme Court hears arguments from companies opposed to providing insurance coverage that includes contraception.
(NBC News)  A controversial mix of politics and religion was the focus of arguments inside the Supreme Court Tuesday.

Justices are considering whether corporations have the same rights to religious freedom as individuals, and if so, does that mean they do not have to provide health coverage for certain forms of contraception mandated by the Affordable Care Act.

"We believe that Americans don't lose their religious freedom when they open a family business," Hobby Lobby's Barbara Green said outside the court. 

Lawyers for the Hobby Lobby chain of arts and crafts stores, owned by evangelical Christians, and Conestoga Wood Specialties, owned by a Mennonite family, told justices that requiring companies to provide certain types of contraceptives violates the owners' Christian faith.

"We never thought we'd see a day when the government would  tell our family we could no longer run our business in a way that affirmed the sanctity of human life," Conestoga CEO Anthony Hahn said.
 
The court's liberal justices seemed to defend the so-called contraception mandate.

Justice Elena Kagan predicted that if the court grants the exemption "you would see religious objectors coming out of the woodwork" to challenge everything from social security to immunizations.

"I believe this court understood women have the right to make their own decisions about their health care and their birth control, and it's not their bosses decision," says Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards. 

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued freedom of religion applies to citizens, not corporations.

Page: [[$index + 1]]
comments powered by Disqus

More News